it is common use in western society assuming dialectic stand of Trias, (Sokrates, Aristoteles and Platon) when entering a reflection on content and debate same. Criticism without a better, upgrading option is poorly visioned and not productive; if substance, content and a vision herself stands in the foreground. It is not an EGO, what is irrelevant in an objective, factual debate. One should always focus to have a better result in a context or case than before when you started out.
Respectful, friendly approach within a team or group of persons is fundamental in an effort to reach harmonious outcome, after all. Thank you Alex for good value.
“Because you do not equate (inevitable) criticism with a decrease in your self-worth” I’ve been experiencing this from a person who is temporarily in my life right now. (House guest) I need to keep your words in mind. This is helpful
Love it , one of the things that pull you back from putting yourself out, was really helpful.
Appreciate it Sakshi
Alex/Joe-Kwame,
it is common use in western society assuming dialectic stand of Trias, (Sokrates, Aristoteles and Platon) when entering a reflection on content and debate same. Criticism without a better, upgrading option is poorly visioned and not productive; if substance, content and a vision herself stands in the foreground. It is not an EGO, what is irrelevant in an objective, factual debate. One should always focus to have a better result in a context or case than before when you started out.
Respectful, friendly approach within a team or group of persons is fundamental in an effort to reach harmonious outcome, after all. Thank you Alex for good value.
Namasté, Joe-Kwame
A deep resonant yesssss to this!🙏👏
“Because you do not equate (inevitable) criticism with a decrease in your self-worth” I’ve been experiencing this from a person who is temporarily in my life right now. (House guest) I need to keep your words in mind. This is helpful